Meteorologist Kelvin Droegemeier Confirmed to Lead White House Science Office

January 6, 2019, 10:44 PM EST

Above: Kelvin Droegemeier, former vice president for research at the University of Oklahoma, and now the new tenth director of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy. Image credit: University of Oklahoma.

The first meteorologist to serve as a U.S. president's chief science adviser was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 3. Kelvin Droegemeier will serve as director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), a position that has traditionally included acting as the president's top adviser on a wide range of science-related matters.

Droegemeier will be OSTP's tenth director since the office was established in 1976. The job involves coordinating science and technology policy across agencies and assisting the Office of Management and Budget in reviewing U.S. support for scientific research and development.

A native of Kansas, Droegemeier earned his bachelor's degree in meteorology at the University of Oklahoma (OU), followed by masters and doctoral degrees in atmospheric science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Droegeiemer joined the OU meteorology faculty in 1985 and became the university's associate vice president for research in 2005 and vice president for research in 2009. He served for 12 years on the National Science Board, from 2004 to 2016, including two years as vice chairman.

Droegemeier has been one of the nation's leaders in fine-scale computer modeling of severe thunderstorms. He was a co-founder of the OU-based Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS), established by the National Science Foundation in 1989. CAPS pioneered the use of supercomputers to carry out storm-scale simulations in the 1990s just as the National Weather Service was deploying its NEXRAD Doppler radar network, which provided valuable ground truth. In 1995, a CAPS model became the first to successfully simulate individual thunderstorms six hours in advance.

Will Trump listen?

Droegemeier has one particularly challenging task ahead of him: providing scientific advice to a president (Donald Trump) who often seems to trust his own instincts more than he does input from experts. "No one should expect that he will be advising this president on any meaningful manner....This president does not appear to seek advice," political scientist Roger Pielke Jr. (University of Colorado Boulder) told CNN.

The Trump administration is now in the process of withdrawing the United States from the global Paris Agreement (although as it happens, no such move could become final under UN rules until November 4, 2020—one day after the U.S. presidential election). Trump himself famously referred in 2012 to climate change as a concept "created for and by the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive". In October 2018, Trump told CBS's Lesley Stahl: "Something’s changing and it’ll change back again. I don’t think it’s a hoax, I think there’s probably a difference. But I don’t know that it’s manmade."

Droegemeier opted not to address climate change in prepared remarks at his Senate confirmation hearing in August, though he did speak out firmly on keeping science free of political influence. When asked by Senator Tom Udall whether he would dedicate himself to addressing climate change impacts in America, Droegemeier said, "I absolutely believe we have to look at the future...I'm very excited to work on that." He addressed the need for resilient rebuilding after disasters and the potential value of blending knowledge from weather and climate models; "In climate modeling, going forward, we certainly need to reduce uncertainty...I think the weather modeling community can be very, very helpful there."

Commentary by Bob Henson

I've known Kelvin since 1985, when he was a brand-new faculty member in the OU meteorology department and I was a graduate student. He's very upbeat and personable, extremely smart and hard-working, and hugely respected within the meteorological community. I was not at all surprised to see Kelvin's nomination getting unusually widespread support from across the political spectrum.
 
We don't yet know how strongly Kelvin will fight for climate science to be taken seriously within the Trump White House. Many science advocates find themselves treading carefully when discussing climate change in Oklahoma, where public attitudes lean conservative and fossil fuel companies wield great political power. It's worth noting that two leading voices on climate change from the Southern Plains—Katharine Hayhoe (Texas Tech University) and Renee McPherson (South Central Regional Climate Center)—applauded Kelvin's nomination, as did physicist Neal Lane (Rice University), an Oklahoma native who served as OSTP director and science adviser for Bill Clinton.
 
All in all, I think Kelvin is as well positioned as anyone to build some important bridges on climate change in a very tough political climate.
 
Jeff Masters contributed to this post.

The views of the author are his/her own and do not necessarily represent the position of The Weather Company or its parent, IBM.

author image

Bob Henson

WU meteorologist Bob Henson, co-editor of Category 6, is the author of "Meteorology Today" and "The Thinking Person's Guide to Climate Change." Before joining WU, he was a longtime writer and editor at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO.

bob.henson@weather.com

@bhensonweather

Recent Articles

January 2019 Among Earth's Four Warmest Januaries

Dr. Jeff Masters


Section: Climate & Climate Change

Serious Flooding Threat Looms for Tennessee Valley This Week and Beyond

Bob Henson


Section: Winter Weather

Please note that DISQUS operates this forum. When you sign in to comment, your sign in information, along with your comments, will be governed by DISQUS' privacy policy. By commenting, you are accepting the DISQUS terms of service.

The comments made below do not necessarily represent the views of Weather Underground; The Weather Company, an IBM Business; or IBM. Comments below should not be perceived as official forecasts or emergency information. For official information on potential storm impacts and evacuation information, please follow guidance from your local authority's emergency operations department.